on July 01, 2026
Modern nutrition is progressively moving away from an exclusively quantitative assessment of diet towards a more integrated approach, in which the quality of the food matrix, the degree of industrial processing, and the biological signals generated by food play an increasingly central role.
Among the elements that have received greater attention in recent decades is the consumption of whole grains and naturally high-fibre foods.
The increasing prevalence of refined, highly processed foods with high digestibility has profoundly altered the relationship between the human body, satiety, and metabolic regulation.
When a food is refined, some of its original structural components are removed.
A whole grain kernel generally consists of three main components: the germ, which contains lipids, vitamins, bioactive compounds, and substances necessary for germination; the endosperm, composed mainly of starch and proteins; and the fibre-rich outer layer, commonly known as bran.
Refining processes remove the germ and outer layers to varying degrees, leaving the starchy component predominant.
This transformation alters not only the nutritional content but also the food's physiological behaviour.
Refined flours should not be considered toxic in a medical sense, but their predominant and systematic consumption can reduce the intake of fibre, micronutrients, and bioactive compounds normally found in whole grains.
Fibre is one of the main distinguishing features of whole plant foods.
From a physiological perspective, fibres are divided into soluble and insoluble types, both of which have important biological functions.
Soluble fibres increase the viscosity of the intestinal contents, slow nutrient absorption, and modulate the postprandial glycaemic response.
Insoluble fibres contribute to faecal volume, intestinal transit, and digestive mechanics.
Available evidence shows that adequate dietary fibre intake is associated with a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes, better body weight control, lower incidence of cardiovascular disease, and improved intestinal health.
One of the most interesting aspects concerns the concept of the food matrix.
Two foods with similar calorie content can generate very different physiological responses.
The presence of fibre, preserved cellular structure, the need for chewing, and the rate of digestion alter the metabolic signal sent to the body.
Hunger regulation depends not only on calories but also on a complex network of neuroendocrine signals involving the stomach, intestine, pancreas, adipose tissue, and brain.
Among these signals, ghrelin, a hormone produced mainly in the stomach that helps regulate appetite, plays a central role.
Foods that require more chewing and cause greater gastric distension may help modulate the sense of satiety more effectively.
The time spent eating also appears to play a role.
Eating quickly has been associated in several studies with higher energy intake and reduced perception of satiety.
Slowing down the pace of a meal—for example, by consciously pausing between bites—can help promote greater awareness of eating.
The benefit does not come from a single ritual but from the opportunity to synchronise ingestion, chewing, and neuroendocrine signals.
Chewing itself has been studied as a metabolic modulator.
Some experimental research suggests that chewing may influence neural circuits involved in eating behaviour, although the mechanisms remain under investigation.
Alongside food structure, the degree of industrial processing is also important.
In recent years, the concept of ultra-processed foods has become more widespread.
This category includes products that often combine refined flours, added sugars, flavourings, emulsifiers, thickeners, modified fats, and formulation strategies designed to make them highly palatable.
Numerous observational and interventional studies have associated high consumption of ultra-processed foods with higher energy intake, weight gain, and worsening metabolic markers.
This does not mean that every industrial product is harmful or that occasional consumption automatically leads to clinical consequences.
The concern arises when such products systematically replace minimally processed foods.
The issue of industrially modified fats also deserves clarification.
Industrial trans fatty acids have been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and adverse changes in lipid profiles.
For this reason, many countries have progressively restricted their use.
The main problem is not the residual nickel from the manufacturing process but the particular lipid structure that alters lipoprotein metabolism and the inflammatory response.
Another frequently debated topic concerns sugars and sweeteners.
Replacing sugar with low-calorie sweeteners generally reduces immediate energy intake.
Current evidence does not show that approved sweeteners directly cause obesity or uncontrolled hunger in the general population.
However, their impact on eating behaviour, the preference for sweet tastes, and individual responses remains an open area of research.
From a practical perspective, a strategy focused on metabolic health can be built around prioritising:
truly whole grains, not simply bran-enriched cereals;
fruit and vegetables in their whole form whenever possible;
regular consumption of legumes;
minimally processed lipid sources;
reducing ultra-processed foods;
meal times that allow for adequate chewing;
mindful reading of labels.
The goal is not to rigidly eliminate individual foods but to improve the overall quality of the nutritional signals that reach our bodies every day.
Metabolic health does not come from dietary perfection but from making consistent choices.
Bibliography
Chandalia M et al. Beneficial effects of high dietary fiber intake in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2000.
Joshipura KJ et al. Fruit and vegetable intake in relation to risk of ischemic stroke. JAMA. 1999.
Juntunen KS et al. High-fiber rye bread and insulin response. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003.
Stevens J et al. Dietary fiber and body weight. Ann Intern Med. 1988.
Raben A et al. Dietary fiber and satiety. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995.
Sakata T et al. Mastication and hypothalamic regulation mechanisms. Brain Research. 2003.
Hall KD et al. Ultra-processed diets cause excess calorie intake and weight gain. Cell Metabolism. 2019.
Reynolds A et al. Carbohydrate quality and human health. Lancet. 2019.
Lichtenstein AH et al. Dietary trans fatty acids and plasma lipids. Circulation. 1999.
Mozaffarian D et al. Trans fatty acids and systemic inflammation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004.
WHO. Healthy Diet Guidelines.
EFSA Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for carbohydrates and dietary fibre.
